Today I did my political duty and spammed my friends with a plea to call their senators. I should add, I virtually never do this. I'm about as jaded and apathetic as they come. But last week I finally got off my apathetic ass and Den and I ventured out to a MoveOn.org house party. Admittedly my motivation was social more than political - I would never sign up to hand out flyers or knock on strangers' doors, but I liked the sound of a house party. Plus, as I explained when I introduced myself and stated my purpose, I pitch consumerism for a living...I have to do something to redeem myself!
So anyway, the issue that I just spammed my friends about is this: our persistent ideologue pain-in-the-fucking-ass excuse for a president has just resubmitted 20 judicial nominees that the senate blocked last term. These kids have resumes 10 feet long filled with pandering to powerful special interests and good-deed-doing for extreme right-wing ideologues at the expense of ordinary Americans. The Dems are uniting to try to block them again, but this time they're in the minority, albeit only just.
So how much do you know about how our government works? Myself, I don't know much because my high school Civics and Free Enterprise class happened to be 6th hour and I always fell asleep with my head on my desk (causing ol' Doc Laneau to rap a yard stick across my desk nearly every day, which had the effect of causing everyone in the class to jump except me... but that's another story). Anyway, what I learned from my MoveOn party, that I didn't learn from my high school Civics class, is that our system is designed such that, in order to avoid situations where a very slim majority (as we now have) might try to ram through extreme legislation or judges, the minority is given the right to filibuster to block nominations (and laws) that it feels are too extreme, thereby forcing compromise. Also known as the system of Checks And Balances (which I do vaguely remember from that boring Civics textbook of yore). Now, for what it's worth, the filibuster tactic has been used almost exclusively by the conservative right over the past 100 years or so, and as a result we do not have such social niceties as universal health care and we do continue to have such debacles as an electorate system, which is to say, the filibuster has historically been a huge pain in the ass for the Democrats. But what comes around sometimes tends to go around, and now the conservative majority is finding itself on the other side of the filibustering game.
Oh, but no, the Reds, they don't like this game so much now. Kind of a headache. Gums up the system. And in THESE TIMES OF TERRORISM yaddayaddayaddda. Nope, can't have that. So Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist is threatening to use a legal loophole to abolish the right to filibuster a Presidential judicial nomination. This tactic is sufficiently drastic as to be affectionately known as the "nuclear option." If Frist uses the nuclear option, this would mean that Dumbass, I mean Bush, would be able to appoint whomever he damnwell chooses to lifetime judicial positions with as little as a 1 vote majority (which, by trick of our asinine electoral process, could be as little as 17% of the popular vote).
There are likely to be 2-4 vacancies on the Supreme Court in the next four years. The freaks of the extreme right are demanding that Frist pull the nuclear trigger now to clear a path through the Senate for a series of nominees in the mold of our favorite drinking buddies Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas (who happen to also be the most aggressive right-wing ideologues on the Court). This would have the potential to overturn more than 100 Supreme Court precedents affecting civil rights, civil liberties, environmental protections, privacy and reproductive rights, separation of church and state, workers' rights, etcetcetc. A Scalia-Thomas majority could also go so far as to reinterpret the Commerce Clause, the Spending Clause and the 14th Amendment, to dismantle the bipartisan social justice achievements of the past seven decades and to eliminate the entire constitutional basis for future progressive initiatives.
Wanna know who's up for vote? Well, there's a William Myers III, who has in fact never been a judge, but does have top notch cred from his career as a lobbyist for the cattle and mining industry, and who has written that all habitat conservation laws are unconstitutional because they interfere with potential profit. Then there's Terrence Boyle, who was once a legal aide to that kind and gentle soul Jesse Helms. Unlike Myers, Boyle has been a judge, however his rulings have been overturned a whopping 120 times by the conservative 4th District Court of Appeals. Some might think this is due to gross errors in judgment or simple incompetence, but we think he's just misunderstood. So we'll give him a pity vote for being such a loser. And then we've got the infamous William Pryor Jr., who during his term as Attorney General of Alabama took money from Phillip Morris and, naturally, since corporate money isn't given out for free, fought against the anti-tobacco lawsuit. Pryor calls Roe v. Wade "the worst abomination of constitutional law in our history" and has consistently argued against the federal protections for the civil rights of minorities, women, gays and lesbians, and the disabled.
So. If you didn't get spammed by me today, do a good deed and give your Senator's intern a call and tell him or her to log your opposition against use of the nuclear option and encourage your senator to support judges that aren't assholes or fucking morons.
